Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | bluelips | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | bigbeau2 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | ander_lizarrakoa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Gruul Aggro | ander_lizarrakoa | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #9097 |
| Golgari Midrange | xelz | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Bant Beanstalk , Bant Gearhulk , Golgari Beanstalk , Golgari Demons , Golgari Graveyard , Golgari Lifedrain Combo , Golgari Midrange
Meta Performance Analysis
Sentinel of the Nameless City ranks #229 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 68%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 49.1%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Sentinel of the Nameless City is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 9.91 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.2%. Sentinel of the Nameless City has a win rate of 67.6%, making it 2.3% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flowstone Infusion | Instant | 5 | 100.0% | 5 |
| Royal Treatment | Instant | 33 | 72.8% | 13 |
| Invasion of Gobakhan | Battle — Siege // Enchantment | 12 | 70.4% | 5 |
| Overprotect | Instant | 11 | 69.8% | 5 |
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 18 | 69.4% | 8 |
| Kellan, Daring Traveler | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout // Sorcery — Adventure | 13 | 68.9% | 6 |
| Aven Interrupter | Creature — Bird Rogue | 24 | 68.5% | 10 |
| Torch the Witness | Sorcery | 27 | 66.5% | 6 |
| Steel Seraph | Artifact Creature — Angel | 21 | 64.8% | 9 |
| Breach the Multiverse | Sorcery | 14 | 63.6% | 5 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Sentinel of the Nameless City than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 5 | 100.0% | 69.7% | +30.3% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 9 | 75.9% | 68.6% | +7.4% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 77.6% | 70.7% | +6.9% |
| Shoot the Sheriff | Instant | 2 | 14 | 72.5% | 68.3% | +4.2% |
| Archfiend of the Dross | Creature — Phyrexian Demon | 4 | 14 | 74.1% | 70.5% | +3.7% |
| Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 2 | 5 | 72.4% | 69.0% | +3.4% |
| Hired Claw | Creature — Lizard Mercenary | 1 | 20 | 71.4% | 68.0% | +3.4% |
| Questing Druid | Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 19 | 72.6% | 70.3% | +2.3% |
| Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 8 | 17 | 70.8% | 68.8% | +2.0% |
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 15 | 68.8% | 66.9% | +1.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 672 | 32.6% | 46.6% |
| Golgari Midrange | 544 | 70.3% | 46.0% |
| Golgari Demons | 290 | 53.2% | 47.7% |
| Selesnya Artifacts | 21 | 100.0% | 69.6% |
| Bant Gearhulk | 13 | 76.5% | 22.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.